skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
Sunday, June 29, 2008
A sign of progress? husbands working for their wives
The
New York Times
presents it as almost a trend. Read the story
here
, which features among other companies, Zuca luggage and Learning Express.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
View mobile version
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Links
Feminist Law Professors
Gender and Sexuality Law Blog
Ms. JD
On the Issues
Domestic Disturbances
Women's Resources and Research Center
Labels
abortion
(54)
adolescence
(47)
adolescents
(31)
age
(36)
animal abuse
(3)
anti-essentialism
(32)
appearance
(83)
arts
(19)
breastfeeding
(1)
children
(102)
constitutional law
(13)
contraception
(14)
crime
(42)
democracy
(21)
dependency
(10)
developing world
(46)
difference feminism
(27)
discrimination
(111)
diversity
(55)
divorce
(17)
domestic violence
(41)
dominance feminism
(17)
double standard
(12)
dressgate
(2)
ecofeminism
(3)
economics
(64)
education
(82)
elderly
(1)
emotion
(44)
employment
(98)
entertainment
(54)
equality
(167)
essentialism
(22)
Europe
(23)
family
(63)
federal
(5)
feminism
(51)
gender and language
(27)
glass ceiling
(33)
health
(60)
Hillary
(62)
human rights
(45)
immigration
(14)
inequality
(39)
international
(73)
intimate relationship
(6)
intimate relationships
(45)
Islam
(12)
judges
(7)
large law firms
(21)
Latina/o
(12)
legal
(25)
legal education
(18)
legal profession
(64)
LGBT
(39)
marriage
(48)
masculinity
(67)
media
(107)
mental illness
(8)
Michelle Obama
(10)
middle age
(9)
middle class
(17)
military
(17)
misogyny
(46)
motherhood
(98)
music
(2)
Palin
(29)
politics
(142)
pop culture
(27)
popular culture
(111)
pornography
(11)
poverty
(26)
power
(80)
pregnancy
(40)
prostitution
(19)
queer
(7)
race
(37)
race/ethnicity
(40)
racism
(10)
radical feminism
(25)
rape
(44)
RBG
(1)
religion
(22)
reproduction
(49)
rural
(5)
Sanders
(4)
separate spheres
(42)
sexual exploitation
(3)
sexual harassment
(45)
sexual negotiation
(10)
sexual violence
(78)
socioeconomic class
(49)
solidarity among women
(116)
sports
(22)
Supreme Court
(21)
third-wave feminism
(24)
toxic masculinity
(2)
U.S. Constitution
(8)
violence against women
(71)
war
(12)
work-life
(114)
Blog Archive
►
2019
(52)
►
May
(3)
►
April
(14)
►
March
(12)
►
February
(19)
►
January
(4)
►
2018
(2)
►
December
(1)
►
March
(1)
►
2017
(39)
►
December
(4)
►
November
(14)
►
October
(9)
►
September
(9)
►
January
(3)
►
2016
(91)
►
December
(4)
►
November
(11)
►
October
(11)
►
September
(11)
►
August
(2)
►
May
(4)
►
April
(13)
►
March
(13)
►
February
(13)
►
January
(9)
►
2015
(55)
►
May
(1)
►
April
(19)
►
March
(12)
►
February
(14)
►
January
(9)
►
2014
(3)
►
November
(1)
►
September
(1)
►
June
(1)
►
2013
(4)
►
June
(2)
►
May
(2)
►
2012
(97)
►
December
(2)
►
November
(25)
►
October
(31)
►
September
(35)
►
August
(1)
►
April
(1)
►
January
(2)
►
2011
(104)
►
December
(21)
►
November
(26)
►
October
(24)
►
September
(29)
►
August
(3)
►
February
(1)
►
2010
(110)
►
December
(10)
►
November
(25)
►
October
(26)
►
September
(37)
►
August
(2)
►
July
(2)
►
May
(1)
►
April
(1)
►
March
(2)
►
February
(2)
►
January
(2)
►
2009
(152)
►
December
(3)
►
November
(25)
►
October
(26)
►
September
(27)
►
August
(8)
►
July
(9)
►
June
(6)
►
May
(13)
►
April
(7)
►
March
(8)
►
February
(6)
►
January
(14)
▼
2008
(165)
►
December
(9)
►
November
(14)
►
October
(16)
►
September
(27)
►
August
(15)
►
July
(6)
▼
June
(13)
A sign of progress? husbands working for their wives
Is the "American Girl" brand good for our girls (f...
What are women rainmakers in Phoenix to do?
Albanian Virgins as "Family Men"
More on Michelle
Obama as the first woman President?
Watch this space . . .and find out if equality in ...
Could Maureen Dowd, by implication, be defending H...
so much interesting stuff about gender, so little ...
A Couple of Columns Worth Reading about the Hillar...
"Feisty" Candidates
Pantyhose and Flip Flops at Law Firms . . .
"Ever Argue with a Woman?"
►
May
(7)
►
April
(17)
►
March
(8)
►
February
(14)
►
January
(19)
►
2007
(1)
►
December
(1)
No comments:
Post a Comment